<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 439 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334421</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2004-05, overturning the treatment of LTCG as income from undisclosed sources and the addition under section 69C. The Tribunal found the share transaction genuine and concluded that the income should be assessed as LTCG. The appeal succeeded based on substantive issues, leading to the deletion of the additions made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2016 22:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 439 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334421</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2004-05, overturning the treatment of LTCG as income from undisclosed sources and the addition under section 69C. The Tribunal found the share transaction genuine and concluded that the income should be assessed as LTCG. The appeal succeeded based on substantive issues, leading to the deletion of the additions made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>