<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 432 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334414</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision in a tax case involving the treatment of Feng Sui consultancy charges as revenue expenditure, not creating new assets, and the disallowance of professional charges under section 40(a)(i) of the Act due to payments for services rendered outside India not attracting tax liability in India. The Assessing Officer&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the FAA&#039;s orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2016 22:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 432 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334414</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision in a tax case involving the treatment of Feng Sui consultancy charges as revenue expenditure, not creating new assets, and the disallowance of professional charges under section 40(a)(i) of the Act due to payments for services rendered outside India not attracting tax liability in India. The Assessing Officer&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the FAA&#039;s orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>