<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 427 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334409</link>
    <description>Payment of duty, interest, redemption fine and 25% of the penalty within 30 days attracted the reduced-penalty scheme under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, so the assessee was entitled to that limited penalty benefit. Penalty under rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2004 could not be sustained against a trader because there was no specific finding that it knowingly acquired, transported, sold or otherwise dealt with excisable goods liable to confiscation with the required knowledge or reason to believe. The reduction in penalty was therefore upheld, while the trader&#039;s penalty was deleted for want of the requisite finding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 13:32:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 427 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334409</link>
      <description>Payment of duty, interest, redemption fine and 25% of the penalty within 30 days attracted the reduced-penalty scheme under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, so the assessee was entitled to that limited penalty benefit. Penalty under rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2004 could not be sustained against a trader because there was no specific finding that it knowingly acquired, transported, sold or otherwise dealt with excisable goods liable to confiscation with the required knowledge or reason to believe. The reduction in penalty was therefore upheld, while the trader&#039;s penalty was deleted for want of the requisite finding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>