<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 425 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334407</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for Rectification of Mistake, emphasizing adherence to duty liability based on the final determination of annual production capacity by the Commissioner. The judgment underscores the importance of complying with legal obligations and focusing on established determinations rather than challenging procedural aspects unrelated to duty liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 13:32:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 425 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334407</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for Rectification of Mistake, emphasizing adherence to duty liability based on the final determination of annual production capacity by the Commissioner. The judgment underscores the importance of complying with legal obligations and focusing on established determinations rather than challenging procedural aspects unrelated to duty liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>