<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 421 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334403</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI set aside the impugned order regarding the recovery of regular credit and related issues, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication on limited grounds raised by the Revenue in their appeal. The decision emphasized the absence of a speaking order on the confirmation of credit reversal, preventing a conclusive resolution on the interest issue raised by the Revenue. The Cross-objection was also disposed of during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 13:32:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 421 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334403</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI set aside the impugned order regarding the recovery of regular credit and related issues, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication on limited grounds raised by the Revenue in their appeal. The decision emphasized the absence of a speaking order on the confirmation of credit reversal, preventing a conclusive resolution on the interest issue raised by the Revenue. The Cross-objection was also disposed of during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>