<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 426 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187955</link>
    <description>A suit for eviction filed within the ten-year exemption period under the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 remains protected even if it is decided after that period expires. The decisive date is the institution of the suit, not the date of final adjudication, because requiring disposal within ten years would defeat the exemption&#039;s object and make it illusory through court delay. The parties&#039; rights crystallise when the suit is filed, and the principle that an act of court should prejudice no one supports that construction. The landlord&#039;s suit was therefore maintainable and the contrary view was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 11:04:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 426 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187955</link>
      <description>A suit for eviction filed within the ten-year exemption period under the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 remains protected even if it is decided after that period expires. The decisive date is the institution of the suit, not the date of final adjudication, because requiring disposal within ten years would defeat the exemption&#039;s object and make it illusory through court delay. The parties&#039; rights crystallise when the suit is filed, and the principle that an act of court should prejudice no one supports that construction. The landlord&#039;s suit was therefore maintainable and the contrary view was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>