<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 416 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334398</link>
    <description>Exim scrips and replenishment licences are treated as goods only when transferred or assigned as marketable instruments for consideration; the original grant is not a sale, though a market transfer may attract sales tax. Where the designated bank receives the instruments merely as agent of the Reserve Bank of India for cancellation and destruction, the purpose is only to extinguish the rights created by the licence and remove the instrument from the market. In that situation, the instrument loses its commercial character and ownership is not transferred in the sense required for purchase tax. The State Bank of India was therefore not liable to purchase tax under Section 4(6)(iii).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 416 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334398</link>
      <description>Exim scrips and replenishment licences are treated as goods only when transferred or assigned as marketable instruments for consideration; the original grant is not a sale, though a market transfer may attract sales tax. Where the designated bank receives the instruments merely as agent of the Reserve Bank of India for cancellation and destruction, the purpose is only to extinguish the rights created by the licence and remove the instrument from the market. In that situation, the instrument loses its commercial character and ownership is not transferred in the sense required for purchase tax. The State Bank of India was therefore not liable to purchase tax under Section 4(6)(iii).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>