<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 413 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334395</link>
    <description>Disputed suppression of waste paper purchases and corresponding craft paper production justified remand for fresh assessment where the first appellate authority had made only lump-sum additions without determining the actual quantity produced. The High Court noted that, in the presence of disputed factual evidence, the assessing authority was the proper forum to examine the material, consider the assessee&#039;s reply, and determine turnover on evidence. It also recognised the appellate power to enhance turnover and upheld fresh determination to secure a reasoned, speaking order on quantified evasion. The remand was sustained, while the final quantum of evaded production and turnover was left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:28:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 413 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334395</link>
      <description>Disputed suppression of waste paper purchases and corresponding craft paper production justified remand for fresh assessment where the first appellate authority had made only lump-sum additions without determining the actual quantity produced. The High Court noted that, in the presence of disputed factual evidence, the assessing authority was the proper forum to examine the material, consider the assessee&#039;s reply, and determine turnover on evidence. It also recognised the appellate power to enhance turnover and upheld fresh determination to secure a reasoned, speaking order on quantified evasion. The remand was sustained, while the final quantum of evaded production and turnover was left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>