<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1588 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187946</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the demand for service tax on commission paid to foreign parties and penalties under Sections 77 and 78. The appellant&#039;s defense of bonafide belief for non-payment was rejected, citing the resolution of the taxability dispute before the relevant period and the recorded transactions. The tribunal found no reasonable cause for the delayed payment of service tax, affirming the impugned order and dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:17:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1588 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187946</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the demand for service tax on commission paid to foreign parties and penalties under Sections 77 and 78. The appellant&#039;s defense of bonafide belief for non-payment was rejected, citing the resolution of the taxability dispute before the relevant period and the recorded transactions. The tribunal found no reasonable cause for the delayed payment of service tax, affirming the impugned order and dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>