https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334392 The appeals were allowed by the Tribunal, providing relief to the appellant in disputes regarding duty and remission claims. The penalties imposed under Rule 25 & 27 were set aside in both cases due to the absence of contumacious conduct or negligence by the appellant. The Tribunal overturned the demands for duty and penalties, granting consequential benefits to the appellant based on the previous order related to a similar fire incident. en-us Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334392 The appeals were allowed by the Tribunal, providing relief to the appellant in disputes regarding duty and remission claims. The penalties imposed under Rule 25 & 27 were set aside in both cases due to the absence of contumacious conduct or negligence by the appellant. The Tribunal overturned the demands for duty and penalties, granting consequential benefits to the appellant based on the previous order related to a similar fire incident. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334392