<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 12 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5661</link>
    <description>An assessee already regularly assessed could not be treated as a new assessee for advance-tax purposes merely because an earlier return was nil, so the statutory obligation to furnish an estimate under section 212(3) did not arise for the later years. A levy of interest under section 217 made on the contrary assumption was therefore based on an obvious mistake apparent from the record. That error was rectifiable under section 154 because the underlying liability premise was incorrect, and the assessee obtained relief on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 12 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5661</link>
      <description>An assessee already regularly assessed could not be treated as a new assessee for advance-tax purposes merely because an earlier return was nil, so the statutory obligation to furnish an estimate under section 212(3) did not arise for the later years. A levy of interest under section 217 made on the contrary assumption was therefore based on an obvious mistake apparent from the record. That error was rectifiable under section 154 because the underlying liability premise was incorrect, and the assessee obtained relief on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>