https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187923 The High Court dismissed the appellant's petition under Art. 226 due to delay in filing, emphasizing the importance of timely petitions for relief. The court highlighted previous cases where delay led to refusal of relief, stressing the need for judicious exercise of discretion. Despite the appellant's argument that the delay did not prejudice the respondents, the court held that negligence or delay impacting relief could not be overlooked. While acknowledging the appellant's claim for relief based on fundamental rights, the court ultimately dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the significance of timely legal action and the discretionary nature of relief under Art. 226. en-us Fri, 22 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Nov 2016 12:32:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187923 The High Court dismissed the appellant's petition under Art. 226 due to delay in filing, emphasizing the importance of timely petitions for relief. The court highlighted previous cases where delay led to refusal of relief, stressing the need for judicious exercise of discretion. Despite the appellant's argument that the delay did not prejudice the respondents, the court held that negligence or delay impacting relief could not be overlooked. While acknowledging the appellant's claim for relief based on fundamental rights, the court ultimately dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the significance of timely legal action and the discretionary nature of relief under Art. 226. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 22 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187923