<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 7 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5660</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals in favor of the Revenue, overturning the High Court&#039;s decision regarding the right to receive compensation as an asset under the Wealth-tax Act. The Court directed a fresh valuation of the asset, emphasizing the present value and consideration of all relevant aspects. The Wealth-tax Officer was instructed to disregard prior valuations and allow both parties to present their contentions during the valuation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 7 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5660</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals in favor of the Revenue, overturning the High Court&#039;s decision regarding the right to receive compensation as an asset under the Wealth-tax Act. The Court directed a fresh valuation of the asset, emphasizing the present value and consideration of all relevant aspects. The Wealth-tax Officer was instructed to disregard prior valuations and allow both parties to present their contentions during the valuation process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>