<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 392 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334374</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal for the A.Y. 2006-07, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the entire amount claimed by the assessee as business expenses. The Tribunal found that the expenses were necessary to maintain the business establishment, emphasizing that the business was operational during the year. It concluded that the expenses were legitimately claimed for the purpose of the business, citing legal precedents and established principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 392 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334374</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal for the A.Y. 2006-07, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the entire amount claimed by the assessee as business expenses. The Tribunal found that the expenses were necessary to maintain the business establishment, emphasizing that the business was operational during the year. It concluded that the expenses were legitimately claimed for the purpose of the business, citing legal precedents and established principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>