<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 387 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334369</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the case back to the CIT(A) for a fresh evaluation of the additional evidence and explanations provided by the assessee. The Tribunal directed that proper and adequate opportunity of being heard should be granted to the assessee in accordance with the principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 387 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334369</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the case back to the CIT(A) for a fresh evaluation of the additional evidence and explanations provided by the assessee. The Tribunal directed that proper and adequate opportunity of being heard should be granted to the assessee in accordance with the principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>