<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 13 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5658</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by the Revenue regarding the eligibility of the assessee for development rebate under section 33(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court found no merit in the appeal, stating that the raised contention did not fall within the scope of the referred question. Therefore, the grant of development rebate at 35 per cent to the assessee was upheld, and no costs were awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 13 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5658</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by the Revenue regarding the eligibility of the assessee for development rebate under section 33(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court found no merit in the appeal, stating that the raised contention did not fall within the scope of the referred question. Therefore, the grant of development rebate at 35 per cent to the assessee was upheld, and no costs were awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>