https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187917 The Court found the recovery notices issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Excise & Service Tax, attaching the bank accounts of the petitioner-company, to be unsustainable as they violated the Court's earlier directive to refrain from coercive recovery actions until the stay application was decided by CESTAT. The Court emphasized the need for the Revenue to seek permission before taking such steps, regardless of any liberty granted by CESTAT. The recovery notices were set aside, the writ petition was allowed, and pending miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs, underscoring the importance of complying with court orders in recovery proceedings. en-us Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Nov 2016 11:17:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187917 The Court found the recovery notices issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Excise & Service Tax, attaching the bank accounts of the petitioner-company, to be unsustainable as they violated the Court's earlier directive to refrain from coercive recovery actions until the stay application was decided by CESTAT. The Court emphasized the need for the Revenue to seek permission before taking such steps, regardless of any liberty granted by CESTAT. The recovery notices were set aside, the writ petition was allowed, and pending miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs, underscoring the importance of complying with court orders in recovery proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187917