<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 1034 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187914</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, stating that deduction under section 80IA should not be reduced from deduction under section 80HHC. The revenue&#039;s appeal on excluding excise duty and sales tax from total turnover for section 80HHC deduction was dismissed, consistent with previous decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 11:06:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 1034 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187914</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, stating that deduction under section 80IA should not be reduced from deduction under section 80HHC. The revenue&#039;s appeal on excluding excise duty and sales tax from total turnover for section 80HHC deduction was dismissed, consistent with previous decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>