https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187911 The Supreme Court found the High Court's order unsatisfactory because it did not give clear and intelligible reasons for quashing part of a notification or for concluding that the issuing authority lacked statutory power to include the impugned explanation. In the absence of adequate reasoning, the order could not withstand judicial scrutiny. The appropriate course was to set aside the High Court's decision and remit the writ petition for fresh consideration and a reasoned disposal, leaving all merits open for determination by the High Court. en-us Tue, 09 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Nov 2016 18:27:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187911 The Supreme Court found the High Court's order unsatisfactory because it did not give clear and intelligible reasons for quashing part of a notification or for concluding that the issuing authority lacked statutory power to include the impugned explanation. In the absence of adequate reasoning, the order could not withstand judicial scrutiny. The appropriate course was to set aside the High Court's decision and remit the writ petition for fresh consideration and a reasoned disposal, leaving all merits open for determination by the High Court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187911