<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 368 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334350</link>
    <description>Fees for technical services received by a UAE resident were treated as business profits under the Indo-UAE treaty because the agreement did not contain a separate charging article for such income. The domestic-law definition could not be imported to tax the receipt where the treaty&#039;s distributive rules otherwise allocated taxing rights. As the services were rendered in the course of the assessee&#039;s regular business and no permanent establishment existed in India, Article 7 barred Indian taxation. The residuary and double-taxation elimination provisions could not be used to restore domestic charging provisions. The addition was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 368 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334350</link>
      <description>Fees for technical services received by a UAE resident were treated as business profits under the Indo-UAE treaty because the agreement did not contain a separate charging article for such income. The domestic-law definition could not be imported to tax the receipt where the treaty&#039;s distributive rules otherwise allocated taxing rights. As the services were rendered in the course of the assessee&#039;s regular business and no permanent establishment existed in India, Article 7 barred Indian taxation. The residuary and double-taxation elimination provisions could not be used to restore domestic charging provisions. The addition was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>