<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 367 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334349</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on the issues of taxability of surplus on prepayment of deferred sales tax, allowance of depreciation on intangible assets, and transfer pricing adjustment for corporate guarantee fee. The disallowance under Section 14A for interest expenditure was also deleted, while the disallowance of Rs. 16,57,492/- was dismissed as not pressed. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 367 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334349</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on the issues of taxability of surplus on prepayment of deferred sales tax, allowance of depreciation on intangible assets, and transfer pricing adjustment for corporate guarantee fee. The disallowance under Section 14A for interest expenditure was also deleted, while the disallowance of Rs. 16,57,492/- was dismissed as not pressed. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>