<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 366 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334348</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act to Rs. 1,00,000. The Tribunal set aside the issues regarding the write-off of dies, debit balances of creditors, and sundry balances for the AO to verify and determine the claims made by the assessee. The appeal by the Revenue was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 19:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 366 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334348</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act to Rs. 1,00,000. The Tribunal set aside the issues regarding the write-off of dies, debit balances of creditors, and sundry balances for the AO to verify and determine the claims made by the assessee. The appeal by the Revenue was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>