<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 776 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187907</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal of the appellant-assessee, ruling that the proviso in section 36(1)(iii) of the IT Act applies prospectively from April 1, 2004. Consequently, the appellant is entitled to the benefit of interest allowance for the assessment year 1989-90. The case is remitted to the High Court for further proceedings in line with this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 776 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187907</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal of the appellant-assessee, ruling that the proviso in section 36(1)(iii) of the IT Act applies prospectively from April 1, 2004. Consequently, the appellant is entitled to the benefit of interest allowance for the assessment year 1989-90. The case is remitted to the High Court for further proceedings in line with this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>