https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187903 Recruitment to judicial service must be governed by the rules prescribing selection on marks finally awarded; an examination authority cannot substitute actual marks with an unauthorised scaling formula. The Court held that a writ under Article 32 was maintainable because the challenge targeted the legal principle in the earlier decision, not its operative final order. It also found the scaling system arbitrary and irrational for this examination because it produced extreme anomalies and unequal treatment. Existing selections and appointments made on the 2003 examination were protected, but limited consequential relief was granted only to eligible petitioners on the stated criteria. en-us Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Feb 2024 14:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187903 Recruitment to judicial service must be governed by the rules prescribing selection on marks finally awarded; an examination authority cannot substitute actual marks with an unauthorised scaling formula. The Court held that a writ under Article 32 was maintainable because the challenge targeted the legal principle in the earlier decision, not its operative final order. It also found the scaling system arbitrary and irrational for this examination because it produced extreme anomalies and unequal treatment. Existing selections and appointments made on the 2003 examination were protected, but limited consequential relief was granted only to eligible petitioners on the stated criteria. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187903