<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (5) TMI 268 - Company Law Board</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187902</link>
    <description>Share transfers made without board approval and contrary to Article 9 of the articles of association were addressed by requiring respondents to offer the proportionate entitlement in the transferred shares to existing shareholders at the original price. A proposed share allotment did not create a right to a larger allocation after the other intended allottee withdrew. Allegations of underbilling, falsified accounts, fund siphoning, deficient stock and purchase records, and asset-price manipulation lacked sufficient supporting evidence. Appointment of relatives to management positions remained within management&#039;s prerogative if compliant with the Companies Act. Share transmission under a will required production of the will and no-objection certificates from other heirs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:38:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (5) TMI 268 - Company Law Board</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187902</link>
      <description>Share transfers made without board approval and contrary to Article 9 of the articles of association were addressed by requiring respondents to offer the proportionate entitlement in the transferred shares to existing shareholders at the original price. A proposed share allotment did not create a right to a larger allocation after the other intended allottee withdrew. Allegations of underbilling, falsified accounts, fund siphoning, deficient stock and purchase records, and asset-price manipulation lacked sufficient supporting evidence. Appointment of relatives to management positions remained within management&#039;s prerogative if compliant with the Companies Act. Share transmission under a will required production of the will and no-objection certificates from other heirs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>