<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 11 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5650</link>
    <description>The retrospective Explanation to section 263 of the Income-tax Act enlarges revisional power where an assessment order has been appealed only in part. Matters in the assessment that were not considered or decided by the appellate authority do not merge with the Commissioner (Appeals) order, so revision can still be exercised over those items. On that basis, the three disputed items, not raised in the assessee&#039;s appeal, remained open to revision under section 263, and the issue was decided in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 13:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 11 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5650</link>
      <description>The retrospective Explanation to section 263 of the Income-tax Act enlarges revisional power where an assessment order has been appealed only in part. Matters in the assessment that were not considered or decided by the appellate authority do not merge with the Commissioner (Appeals) order, so revision can still be exercised over those items. On that basis, the three disputed items, not raised in the assessee&#039;s appeal, remained open to revision under section 263, and the issue was decided in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>