https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187899 An order is not interlocutory for Section 397(2) CrPC if, on acceptance of the objection, the criminal proceeding would come to an end; on that principle, revisional scrutiny is not barred merely because the order is passed at an interim stage. In summons-case proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the magistrate may, in the interests of justice, dispense with the accused's personal attendance and permit appearance through counsel, subject to safeguards such as identity assurance and continued power to require attendance later. The challenge to the revisional order succeeded and the impugned order was set aside. en-us Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Nov 2016 15:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187899 An order is not interlocutory for Section 397(2) CrPC if, on acceptance of the objection, the criminal proceeding would come to an end; on that principle, revisional scrutiny is not barred merely because the order is passed at an interim stage. In summons-case proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the magistrate may, in the interests of justice, dispense with the accused's personal attendance and permit appearance through counsel, subject to safeguards such as identity assurance and continued power to require attendance later. The challenge to the revisional order succeeded and the impugned order was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187899