<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5649</link>
    <description>The constitutional validity of the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997 was upheld, and the challenge was rejected. The Supreme Court accepted the Bombay High Court&#039;s reasoning and noted the Government&#039;s anti-evasion measures, including intensified search and survey action under the Income-tax Act, enhanced penalties and prosecution for detected undisclosed income, administrative steps such as PAN issuance and computerisation, and the Scheme&#039;s assurance of confidentiality for voluntary disclosures. On that basis, the Court declined to interfere with the High Court&#039;s conclusion, and the special leave petition was dismissed, leaving the Scheme affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5649</link>
      <description>The constitutional validity of the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997 was upheld, and the challenge was rejected. The Supreme Court accepted the Bombay High Court&#039;s reasoning and noted the Government&#039;s anti-evasion measures, including intensified search and survey action under the Income-tax Act, enhanced penalties and prosecution for detected undisclosed income, administrative steps such as PAN issuance and computerisation, and the Scheme&#039;s assurance of confidentiality for voluntary disclosures. On that basis, the Court declined to interfere with the High Court&#039;s conclusion, and the special leave petition was dismissed, leaving the Scheme affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>