<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 356 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187886</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision to quash the charge-sheet against the respondent, emphasizing the need for the respondent to first submit a reply before seeking Tribunal intervention. The Court highlighted the importance of following proper disciplinary procedures and allowing the disciplinary authority to assess the respondent&#039;s response before resorting to judicial remedies. The respondent&#039;s premature application to the Tribunal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 14:06:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 356 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187886</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision to quash the charge-sheet against the respondent, emphasizing the need for the respondent to first submit a reply before seeking Tribunal intervention. The Court highlighted the importance of following proper disciplinary procedures and allowing the disciplinary authority to assess the respondent&#039;s response before resorting to judicial remedies. The respondent&#039;s premature application to the Tribunal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>