<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 350 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334332</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals with consequential relief. It clarified that duty liability should be discharged based on the price of goods cleared as per supplier instructions, especially when the goods were supplied at the same price to the purchasers. The decision was based on established precedents and the specific facts and circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 350 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334332</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals with consequential relief. It clarified that duty liability should be discharged based on the price of goods cleared as per supplier instructions, especially when the goods were supplied at the same price to the purchasers. The decision was based on established precedents and the specific facts and circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>