<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5646</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeals in favor of the Revenue, holding that the development rebate was rightly withdrawn under Section 155(5) of the Income-tax Act. The court determined that the sale of machinery within eight years violated the conditions outlined in Sections 33, 34, and 155(5), leading to the withdrawal of the development rebate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5646</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeals in favor of the Revenue, holding that the development rebate was rightly withdrawn under Section 155(5) of the Income-tax Act. The court determined that the sale of machinery within eight years violated the conditions outlined in Sections 33, 34, and 155(5), leading to the withdrawal of the development rebate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>