<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (8) TMI 198 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187866</link>
    <description>Election petitions under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 operate as a self-contained statutory code, so the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to permit condonation of delay in impleading a person against whom corrupt practice is alleged. The Act makes joinder of such a candidate mandatory, and non-compliance with the required party provisions attracts dismissal. A candidate does not lose necessary-party status merely because he has withdrawn from contest if the petition still alleges corrupt practice against him. The separate notice-and-hearing safeguard for persons later named in findings does not override the mandatory joinder requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:10:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (8) TMI 198 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187866</link>
      <description>Election petitions under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 operate as a self-contained statutory code, so the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to permit condonation of delay in impleading a person against whom corrupt practice is alleged. The Act makes joinder of such a candidate mandatory, and non-compliance with the required party provisions attracts dismissal. A candidate does not lose necessary-party status merely because he has withdrawn from contest if the petition still alleges corrupt practice against him. The separate notice-and-hearing safeguard for persons later named in findings does not override the mandatory joinder requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>