<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 928 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187861</link>
    <description>A statutory appeal to the High Court under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 does not, by itself, exclude a further intra-court appeal under the Letters Patent. The non-obstante clause was treated as regulating the appellate forum rather than abolishing charter jurisdiction, and the phrase &quot;an appeal&quot; was not read as limiting the High Court to a single stage of appeal. Section 26, which treats the award as a decree and its grounds as a judgment, also supported maintainability. A Letters Patent Appeal therefore remains maintainable unless expressly or by necessary implication barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 928 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187861</link>
      <description>A statutory appeal to the High Court under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 does not, by itself, exclude a further intra-court appeal under the Letters Patent. The non-obstante clause was treated as regulating the appellate forum rather than abolishing charter jurisdiction, and the phrase &quot;an appeal&quot; was not read as limiting the High Court to a single stage of appeal. Section 26, which treats the award as a decree and its grounds as a judgment, also supported maintainability. A Letters Patent Appeal therefore remains maintainable unless expressly or by necessary implication barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>