https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187862 Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction is limited to correcting grave injustice, patent legal error, perversity, or jurisdictional failure, and cannot be used as an appellate review of a subordinate court's reasoned order. On that basis, the High Court's interference with the order permitting amendment of the written statement was held unsustainable. Amendments under Order VI Rule 17 should ordinarily be allowed where they aid proper adjudication and do not take away an accrued right or cause serious prejudice. The proposed amendment was treated as an elaboration of the defence and an alternative plea, with no clear withdrawal of admission or ative delay shown; the amendment was therefore restored. en-us Wed, 12 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:39:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187862 Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction is limited to correcting grave injustice, patent legal error, perversity, or jurisdictional failure, and cannot be used as an appellate review of a subordinate court's reasoned order. On that basis, the High Court's interference with the order permitting amendment of the written statement was held unsustainable. Amendments under Order VI Rule 17 should ordinarily be allowed where they aid proper adjudication and do not take away an accrued right or cause serious prejudice. The proposed amendment was treated as an elaboration of the defence and an alternative plea, with no clear withdrawal of admission or ative delay shown; the amendment was therefore restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187862