https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187855 The court found that the Accountant General had the authority to compulsorily retire the appellant, as he was the appropriate authority empowered by a Ministry of Finance notification. However, the court quashed the retirement order due to reliance on outdated adverse reports, emphasizing that a long-serving officer with no recent adverse entries could not be retired based on obsolete information. The court directed the Accountant General to reconsider the decision based on current and legal material. The appellant's appeal was allowed, and they were awarded costs of Rs. 2,000. en-us Mon, 18 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Apr 2017 14:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187855 The court found that the Accountant General had the authority to compulsorily retire the appellant, as he was the appropriate authority empowered by a Ministry of Finance notification. However, the court quashed the retirement order due to reliance on outdated adverse reports, emphasizing that a long-serving officer with no recent adverse entries could not be retired based on obsolete information. The court directed the Accountant General to reconsider the decision based on current and legal material. The appellant's appeal was allowed, and they were awarded costs of Rs. 2,000. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187855