<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 329 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334311</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and deleting the disallowance made under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal found that the clerical error in naming the entity in the certificate did not warrant the disallowance of expenses, as the actual financial transactions and TDS claims were in line with the assessee&#039;s submissions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:17:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 329 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334311</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and deleting the disallowance made under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal found that the clerical error in naming the entity in the certificate did not warrant the disallowance of expenses, as the actual financial transactions and TDS claims were in line with the assessee&#039;s submissions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>