<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 326 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334308</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee regarding treating royalty payments as revenue expenditure and directed the AO to recompute the disallowance under section 14A. Other grounds were either withdrawn, not pressed, or deemed consequential/premature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 326 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334308</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee regarding treating royalty payments as revenue expenditure and directed the AO to recompute the disallowance under section 14A. Other grounds were either withdrawn, not pressed, or deemed consequential/premature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>