<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 324 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334306</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263. The Tribunal directed a re-examination of capital gains, emphasizing the jurisdiction of the Commissioner to revise orders on unaddressed issues. Failure to apply Section 50C was deemed prejudicial to revenue interests, necessitating reassessment with proper consideration of relevant provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 324 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334306</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263. The Tribunal directed a re-examination of capital gains, emphasizing the jurisdiction of the Commissioner to revise orders on unaddressed issues. Failure to apply Section 50C was deemed prejudicial to revenue interests, necessitating reassessment with proper consideration of relevant provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>