<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 322 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334304</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) decisions to delete penalties on various disallowances challenged by the revenue. The penalties were deleted as the expenses were disclosed fully, genuine, and in line with legal precedents. The Tribunal found no concealment or submission of inaccurate particulars by the assessee, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:11:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 322 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334304</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) decisions to delete penalties on various disallowances challenged by the revenue. The penalties were deleted as the expenses were disclosed fully, genuine, and in line with legal precedents. The Tribunal found no concealment or submission of inaccurate particulars by the assessee, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>