<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 305 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334287</link>
    <description>Payment of the due amount and interest was treated as a decisive factor against further relief: after recording the Revenue&#039;s submission that both had already been paid, the Supreme Court found no merit in the special leave petition and declined to entertain it further. No other legal or factual issues were considered or decided, and the petition was dismissed as devoid of merit on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 13:50:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 305 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334287</link>
      <description>Payment of the due amount and interest was treated as a decisive factor against further relief: after recording the Revenue&#039;s submission that both had already been paid, the Supreme Court found no merit in the special leave petition and declined to entertain it further. No other legal or factual issues were considered or decided, and the petition was dismissed as devoid of merit on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>