<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 300 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334282</link>
    <description>The final invoice and Bank Realization Certificate were accepted as reliable evidence of the amount actually realised on export, because no contrary material showed receipt of any sum beyond the invoice amount. On that basis, the assessable value was correctly finalised using those documents. The Commissioner (Appeals) had already addressed the department&#039;s objections in a reasoned order, and no infirmity was found in that appellate decision. The departmental challenge therefore failed, and the appellate order was sustained with the appeal rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 300 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334282</link>
      <description>The final invoice and Bank Realization Certificate were accepted as reliable evidence of the amount actually realised on export, because no contrary material showed receipt of any sum beyond the invoice amount. On that basis, the assessable value was correctly finalised using those documents. The Commissioner (Appeals) had already addressed the department&#039;s objections in a reasoned order, and no infirmity was found in that appellate decision. The departmental challenge therefore failed, and the appellate order was sustained with the appeal rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>