<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5634</link>
    <description>The Court held that the question concerning depreciation on a guest house building and other assets raised a referable question of law. The High Court should therefore have required the Tribunal to draw up a statement of case and refer the question for decision, rather than refusing reference. The refusal to refer was unsustainable, and the matter was remitted for reference of that question to the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 14:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5634</link>
      <description>The Court held that the question concerning depreciation on a guest house building and other assets raised a referable question of law. The High Court should therefore have required the Tribunal to draw up a statement of case and refer the question for decision, rather than refusing reference. The refusal to refer was unsustainable, and the matter was remitted for reference of that question to the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>