<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 299 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334281</link>
    <description>An assessment order under the tax statute must reflect independent application of mind to the dealer&#039;s objections and supporting records; mechanical reliance on an enforcement wing report is invalid. Here, the authority did not examine the dealer&#039;s explanation, purchase registers, breakup details, or other materials called for in the notice, and the objections were not meaningfully considered. The denial of an effective personal hearing also vitiated the assessment. The assessment orders were therefore unsustainable and were quashed, with a direction to redo the assessment after considering the objections, records, cited decision, and after affording personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 299 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334281</link>
      <description>An assessment order under the tax statute must reflect independent application of mind to the dealer&#039;s objections and supporting records; mechanical reliance on an enforcement wing report is invalid. Here, the authority did not examine the dealer&#039;s explanation, purchase registers, breakup details, or other materials called for in the notice, and the objections were not meaningfully considered. The denial of an effective personal hearing also vitiated the assessment. The assessment orders were therefore unsustainable and were quashed, with a direction to redo the assessment after considering the objections, records, cited decision, and after affording personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>