<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1486 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187843</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the duty demand, interest, and penalty under Rule 25 but confirmed the penalty under Rule 27 for contravention of Central Excise Rules. The appellant was directed to pay the upheld penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:20:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1486 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187843</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the duty demand, interest, and penalty under Rule 25 but confirmed the penalty under Rule 27 for contravention of Central Excise Rules. The appellant was directed to pay the upheld penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>