<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1160 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187844</link>
    <description>Supply of goods to a Special Economic Zone warehousing unit for its authorised operations was treated as export under the SEZ framework, because Rule 18(5) of the SEZ Rules, 2006 recognises warehousing and related commercial operations as authorised activities and the authorisation letter supported that use. On that basis, the supply qualified for refund of unutilised Cenvat credit under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2005, and the refund was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:20:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1160 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187844</link>
      <description>Supply of goods to a Special Economic Zone warehousing unit for its authorised operations was treated as export under the SEZ framework, because Rule 18(5) of the SEZ Rules, 2006 recognises warehousing and related commercial operations as authorised activities and the authorisation letter supported that use. On that basis, the supply qualified for refund of unutilised Cenvat credit under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2005, and the refund was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>