<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1194 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187846</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay and, after examining the record, found the central excise appeal to be devoid of merit, leading to dismissal of the appeal. The order reflects a brief procedural disposal rather than any substantive exposition of excise law, and the decisive basis recorded is the Court&#039;s assessment that no arguable ground warranted interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:20:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1194 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187846</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay and, after examining the record, found the central excise appeal to be devoid of merit, leading to dismissal of the appeal. The order reflects a brief procedural disposal rather than any substantive exposition of excise law, and the decisive basis recorded is the Court&#039;s assessment that no arguable ground warranted interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>