https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187848 A strike notice under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act is valid when it substantially complies with the prescribed form and contains the essential particulars of the union, employer, proposed strike and reasons; omission of an inapplicable clause does not invalidate it. The strike could not be treated as unlawful under the special restriction for recognised unions because that basis was not established on the record. A strike is barred during the currency of a settlement only in respect of matters expressly covered by that settlement; grievances about non-implementation of settled terms, or independent concerns such as unsafe working conditions, fall outside that bar. The High Court's supervisory interference under Article 227 was justified because the Labour Court's findings were patently erroneous. en-us Fri, 11 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:20:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187848 A strike notice under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act is valid when it substantially complies with the prescribed form and contains the essential particulars of the union, employer, proposed strike and reasons; omission of an inapplicable clause does not invalidate it. The strike could not be treated as unlawful under the special restriction for recognised unions because that basis was not established on the record. A strike is barred during the currency of a settlement only in respect of matters expressly covered by that settlement; grievances about non-implementation of settled terms, or independent concerns such as unsafe working conditions, fall outside that bar. The High Court's supervisory interference under Article 227 was justified because the Labour Court's findings were patently erroneous. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187848