https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334278 A sick industrial company seeking revival was granted enlargement of stay, as the Tribunal reconsidered the pre-deposit requirement in light of BIFR proceedings, an operating agency's viability study, and negative net worth; recovery of the adjudication dues, including interest and penalty, was kept in abeyance until disposal of the appeal. On jurisdiction, the Tribunal held that the place of the first adjudication order determined the forum, and because that order had been passed at Meerut, the appeal remained within its jurisdiction after bifurcation of the Commissionerate. en-us Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334278 A sick industrial company seeking revival was granted enlargement of stay, as the Tribunal reconsidered the pre-deposit requirement in light of BIFR proceedings, an operating agency's viability study, and negative net worth; recovery of the adjudication dues, including interest and penalty, was kept in abeyance until disposal of the appeal. On jurisdiction, the Tribunal held that the place of the first adjudication order determined the forum, and because that order had been passed at Meerut, the appeal remained within its jurisdiction after bifurcation of the Commissionerate. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334278