<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5630</link>
    <description>Amounts paid under an arrangement that contravened foreign exchange law were not allowable as business expenditure or business loss under the Income-tax Act, 1961. Expenditure incurred to facilitate or continue an unlawful transaction is not laid out wholly and exclusively for business purposes, even if the arrangement is said to be commercially convenient or intended to reduce loss. The principle that illegal receipts or losses may sometimes be considered in tax computation does not extend to deductions for outgoings incurred in violation of another statute, where the underlying arrangement is unlawful and opposed to public policy. The claimed reduction of taxable income on the basis of the illegal payment was therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2025 09:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5630</link>
      <description>Amounts paid under an arrangement that contravened foreign exchange law were not allowable as business expenditure or business loss under the Income-tax Act, 1961. Expenditure incurred to facilitate or continue an unlawful transaction is not laid out wholly and exclusively for business purposes, even if the arrangement is said to be commercially convenient or intended to reduce loss. The principle that illegal receipts or losses may sometimes be considered in tax computation does not extend to deductions for outgoings incurred in violation of another statute, where the underlying arrangement is unlawful and opposed to public policy. The claimed reduction of taxable income on the basis of the illegal payment was therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>