<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 11 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5627</link>
    <description>SC interpreted &quot;assessment proceeding&quot; in Explanation 1 to section 153 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to cover the entire continuum from filing of return or issuance of notice under sections 139/142(1) up to passing of the assessment order under sections 143(3) or 144. It held that an order staying the passing of the final assessment order constitutes a stay of assessment proceedings for limitation purposes. Consequently, the period during which the HC&#039;s stay order operated must be excluded in computing the limitation for assessment, rendering the assessments within time. The appeals were dismissed, and the Assessing Officer was granted four months to complete the assessments pursuant to the impugned notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 13:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 11 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5627</link>
      <description>SC interpreted &quot;assessment proceeding&quot; in Explanation 1 to section 153 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to cover the entire continuum from filing of return or issuance of notice under sections 139/142(1) up to passing of the assessment order under sections 143(3) or 144. It held that an order staying the passing of the final assessment order constitutes a stay of assessment proceedings for limitation purposes. Consequently, the period during which the HC&#039;s stay order operated must be excluded in computing the limitation for assessment, rendering the assessments within time. The appeals were dismissed, and the Assessing Officer was granted four months to complete the assessments pursuant to the impugned notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>